INTERIOR O-LINE
TOP 5 QB VIDEO
1
Bryce Young
2
CJ Stroud
3
Hendon Hooker
4
Dorian Thompson-Robinson
5
Jaren Hall
1
Donovan Jackson
OG/OT | OHIO STATE | 6’4 | 320
Strengths: Jackson is a well-rounded interior lineman with valuable experience. He plays with a solid, balanced base and consistently maintains proper pad level and leverage. His functional strength shows up in the run game, and he’s able to sustain blocks effectively in pass protection. Jackson is a high-IQ player with strong on-field awareness, and he even logged reps at left tackle during a crucial stretch of Ohio State’s 2024 season. Weaknesses: He’s not overly athletic and can appear a bit stiff or robotic in his stance at times. Bottom Line: Jackson projects as a reliable, well-rounded interior lineman with added versatility to play tackle in the right system.
Grade: Round 2
N/A
2
Tyler Booker
OG | ALABAMA | 6’5 | 325
Strengths: Booker is a physical guard with solid mass who uses his frame and length effectively. He plays with good leverage and consistently drives defenders off the ball. His ability to sustain blocks and maul in the run game stands out, especially in straight-ahead, North-South schemes. Weaknesses: He’s not particularly nimble or athletic and struggles to generate burst when pulling or climbing to the second level. Bottom Line: Booker is best suited for a downhill, power-based system. In the right fit, he can develop into a very dependable and effective NFL guard.
Grade: Round 2
N/A
3
Grey Zabel
OG/C | NDSU | 6’6 | 305
Strengths: Zabel is a well-rounded, athletic lineman who primarily played offensive tackle at NDSU but showcased true positional versatility at the Senior Bowl. He moves exceptionally well in space, with impressive lateral agility, footwork, and the ability to redirect and counter pass-rush moves. Zabel is light on his feet and offers stability as a pass protector. Weaknesses: He can play a bit upright at times and may benefit from adding more mass. His hand placement and arm length are concerns, though less so if he kicks inside. Bottom Line: Zabel has the athleticism, technique, and versatility to develop into a quality NFL lineman.
Grade: Round 2
N/A
4
Tate Ratledge
OG | GEORGIA | 6’6 | 320
Strengths: Ratledge is a well-rounded, experienced guard with a stout build and consistent pad level. He plays with strong leverage, sustains blocks effectively in pass protection, and mauls defenders in the run game. His physical temperament and solid on-field awareness make him a steady presence, and he tested very well athletically during the draft process. Weaknesses: There’s not much to knock. He lacks experience or versatility outside of right guard. Bottom Line: Ratledge is a quality interior lineman who brings physicality, reliability, and athletic upside to any offensive unit.
Grade: Round 2
N/A
5
Jonah Savaiinaea
OG/OT | ARIZONA | 6’6 | 336
Strengths: Savaiinaea primarily played tackle in college but projects as a guard at the next level. He’s quick out of his stance and has a wide, thick frame that gives him a physical edge. He shows solid athleticism for his size and brings positional versatility that will be valuable in the NFL. Weaknesses: He needs to improve his hand usage, becoming more assertive in initiating contact and consistently gaining leverage throughout reps. Bottom Line: If Savaiinaea can refine his technique, his size, athletic profile, and versatility make him an intriguing developmental piece at the next level.
Grade: Round 2
N/A
6
Wyatt Milum
OG/OT | WVU | 6’6 | 317
Strengths: Milum played offensive tackle in college and brings impressive functional strength and a true finisher’s mentality. His production is elite—he didn’t allow a single sack over three years at left tackle. Milum plays with excellent timing, anticipation, recognition, and spacing, consistently using his hands to win reps. Weaknesses: He’s not particularly athletic and plays with a somewhat upright stance; improved bend would help. Length is a major concern, and he’ll likely need to transition inside to guard at the next level. Bottom Line: Milum’s OT tape is really solid, making him a great litmus test for whether arm length truly limits OT potential.
Grade: Round 2
N/A
7
Jared Wilson
C | GEORGIA | 6’3 | 310
Strengths: Wilson is a strong, thick-built center who had a highly productive 2024 season. He plays with a low, wide stance and maintains solid pad level, showing a powerful anchor and dominance in tight spaces. Once engaged, he’s very difficult to move. His athletic testing was off the charts, and he has the movement skills to be an asset in space. Weaknesses: He had limited snaps prior to year four and is still developing his feel for angles and timing in real-time reps. Bottom Line: Wilson has the physical tools, power, and athleticism to develop into a solid NFL center with long-term starting potential.
Grade: Round 3
N/A
8
Dylan Fairchild
OG | GEORGIA | 6’4 | 315
Strengths: Fairchild is a reliable, stout lineman with a strong frame that brings versatility and toughness to the next level. He displays solid functional strength in the run game, consistently displacing defenders off their spots. Fairchild uses his hands well and has been highly dependable throughout his career, allowing zero sacks. Weaknesses: He’s still a bit inexperienced in terms of overall game reps and isn’t particularly athletic, making him a better fit for a power-based scheme. Bottom Line: Fairchild’s frame, strength, and technique give him a strong foundation to develop into a starting guard in the NFL.
Grade: Round 4
N/A
9
Miles Frazier
OG | LSU | 6’5 | 325
Strengths: Frazier is an experienced, versatile lineman with great size and a thick NFL-ready frame. He’s played four positions across the offensive line, offering valuable flexibility. He has a strong anchor in pass protection and shows the ability to displace defenders in the run game with raw power. Weaknesses: Frazier is an adequate athlete but can appear sluggish when asked to redirect or execute more complex blocks in space. His pad level can rise too high at times, and he plays with slightly heavy feet. Bottom Line: Frazier is best suited for a phone-booth role and projects as a dependable guard with starting potential in a power-based scheme.
Grade: Round 4
N/A
10
Charles Grant
OG/OT | WILLIAM & MARY | 6’4 | 300
Strengths: Grant is an experienced lineman who primarily played tackle and brings solid length and pop in his hands, allowing him to strike effectively in zone concepts. He’s a smooth, fluid athlete who looks comfortable in space and operates well in pass-protection sets. Weaknesses: He’ll need to add mass at the next level, as his functional strength is a concern. His angle consistency also needs improvement, particularly in space. Bottom Line: Grant has appealing traits and movement skills that give him developmental upside and versatility across the line.
Grade: Round 4
N/A
1
Jake Majors
C | TEXAS | 6’3 | 315
Strengths: Majors is a highly experienced and productive center who plays with consistently low pad level. He has a big, dense, well-proportioned frame and looks comfortable operating in space. He shows the athleticism to climb to the second level and make plays, while also displaying strong vision, awareness, and overall high football IQ. Weaknesses: His angles in space can be inconsistent, and while his anchor is serviceable, there’s room for improvement against stronger interior defenders. Bottom Line: Majors has the build, experience, and mental makeup to develop into a starting center at the NFL level.
Grade: Round 5
N/A
12
Garrett Dellinger
OG | LSU | 6’5 | 322
Strengths: Dellinger is a big, stout lineman with impressive strength and a physical, old-school play style. He consistently displaces defenders in the run game and offers a strong anchor in pass protection. With solid experience and the versatility to play multiple positions, he brings value as both a starter and depth piece. Weaknesses: He needs to improve his pad level, as his heavier upper half can lead to leverage issues. His timing in space could be sharper, and he’s dealt with some injury concerns. Bottom Line: Dellinger’s size, toughness, and experience give him the tools to potentially develop into a starter in the NFL.
Grade: Round 5
N/A
13
Jonah Monheim
C | USC | 6’5 | 310
Strengths: Monheim is an extremely versatile, experienced, and dependable lineman with the rare ability to play any position along the offensive line. He’s accurate with his hands, moves well in space, and gets impressively low for his size. He consistently makes plays at the second level and looks natural operating in open space. Weaknesses: He lacks top-end power and won’t overwhelm defenders as a mauler. His arm length is also a concern, which may limit his ceiling. Bottom Line: Given his value range, Monheim’s versatility, toughness, and football IQ make him a smart late Day 3 or priority UDFA option.
Grade: Round 7
N/A
14
Seth McLaughlin
C | OHIO STATE | 6’4 | 305
Strengths: McLaughlin is a stout, experienced lineman who has had success at two major programs—Ohio State and Alabama. He shows solid power in tight spaces and has a strong anchor that holds up well in pass protection. Weaknesses: He plays too upright at times and will need to maintain a lower pad level at the next level. His shorter arm length can lead to occasional misses in hand placement, and he carries some injury history. Bottom Line: McLaughlin’s strength, pedigree, and experience make him a solid depth option late on day 3 or as a priority UDFA.